Hey! And it's not always straightforward and faster and 100% utilized with more cores etc, as export is.Also it helps import previews and develop module when you make and apply a some preset with Sharpening and Noise Reduction set to 0. We actually just put a post up about why we are shifting to DDR4-3200 RAM on (most) of our systems: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . So my questions are: 1) given everything I’ve told you, which should I go with? Benchmark. The $/performance looks amazing for a Ryzen 3900 powered Lightroom workstation. In the past, there were arguments for using an Intel processor for Lightroom Classic if you wanted to optimize for active tasks like scrolling through images, but with the new Ryzen 5000-series CPUs, AMD takes a solid lead no matter the task. Der Intel Core i9-11900K kann den AMD Ryzen 9 5950X bei einem Gaming-Benchmark übertreffen 14.12.2020 Cydia, der "App Store für Jailbreaker", verklagt Apple wegen des App Store-Monopols 11.12.2020 It shouldn't affect performance much, but good benchmarking is about removing variables to try to get the most accurate results as possible. I also know Puget Systems recommendations for RAM frequency but in the real world there are many out there with 3600 Mhz or more, see Puget systems database results :-) My working settings are moderate CL 16-18-18-38 2933 Mhz. We were close about a month ago, then we realized Lightroom 9.0 was going to launch during Adobe MAX so we held off. Hello AMD! (assuming that the 10700k in these results is on par with that old 9900k). Frequency can be grabbed through WMI or through the command line, but timings would need an external application which we have tried to avoid doing since it makes cross-platform support much harder. AMD’s focus has been on offering higher core count processors v their Intel rivals but the performance per core of an AMD processor is still very slightly behind that of Intel. Maybe it is a bigger deal on older GPUs like your RX 570? You can apply those after you're done, as a batch. 3950x: 19 min 30 sek Here both CPUs had 100% usage for the entire exporte, but despite having twice the core counts the 3950x was slower. Since the 5600x isn't out yet, there's no testing to indicate if it's supposed faster single core speed will help improve performance in Lightroom over a CPU like the 3700x, which is around the same price but has 2 more cores/4 more threads. That seems huge considering we only see 5-15% gains between CPU generations. The Lightroom benchmark is a bit finicky at times since we have to do quite a bit of the testing via external scripts, and de-focusing the Lightroom window can make things break. Overall, Ryzen is unfortunately not a great choice for Lightroom. I see, it's difficult and very interesting. Lightroom is hard to benchmark since the things that are easiest to test (importing, exporting, generating previews, etc.) We saw some odd performance issues with the Ryzen 9 5950X, but the Ryzen 7 5800X and Ryzen 9 5900X beat the Intel Core i9 10900K by a solid 14% and 21% respectively, while the Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K by a bit smaller 11%. PugetBench V0.8 BETA for Lightroom Classic, Best Workstation PC for Adobe Lightroom Classic (Winter 2020), Adobe Lightroom Classic: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Adobe Lightroom Classic - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core 10th Gen vs AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Threadripper 3990X 64 Core, What is the Best CPU for Photography (2019), Lightroom Classic CPU Roundup: AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, AMD Threadripper 2, Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series, Lightroom Classic CPU performance: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X. I really wouldn't advise going above 3200MHz though. 3) Adobe CLAIMS it only uses 6 cores, if that’s the case, do we expect them to start utilizing more cores in the future? It is looking like a pretty massive programming project to not only allow people to upload, but sort, search, compare, etc., but that is something we are really excited about doing. Generally though, most people don't upgrade their CPU every generation since the performance gains usually aren't enough to warrant it. If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion. At a recent event, Intel ran a comparison using Adobe Lightroom that showed better performance on a Tiger Lake i7-118G7 machine versus one equipped with a Ryzen 4800U. Yet, if i take a look on the scores of the 9900k it's 921 (87.7 active + 96.5 passive). Can you please explain this? Maybe in the future we will try to figure out reliable ways to check for all those things, but for now we are more concerned about making the benchmarks reliable and that they are testing everything we want. Not sure there is anything meaningfully faster that will go into the current CPU socket. It is also worth noting that the 5800X and 5900X outperformed the 10900K not only in the passive tasks but the active ones as well, which was where Intel was previously maintaining a slight edge. Sadly the benchmark doesn't cover one of the most important metrics for real life photographer - how long it takes to import RAWs with Standard/1:1 previews to be generated, so I know which CPU will let me work asap. The 8-core Xeon will fit but considering how much slower it is, not sure that would be an upgrade. Since this testing was completed, Premiere Pro 14.2 released with some huge GPU performance improvements. Should you choose the new Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core CPU or the Intel i9 9900K 8-core? 4-core CPUs are becoming hard to find (but not yet impossible), and I would certainly like to upgrade my computer to take advantage of the i9 or Ryzen power in all my … Either way you look at it, however, the 3950X further solidifies AMD's lead over Intel for Lightroom Classic. Yep, you are right on the average thing, the only thing you missed was that we multiple the average by 10 because a bigger number means it is more important. You say that the score of 1000 is made by the average of Passive Score + Active score of a system who is based on the Intel 9900K. Comparing the 5600X to the more similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K, the 5600X is a decent 11% faster in our Lightroom Classic benchmark. With that being said, this is going to be a new build for me, and I plan on using it for gaming + my wife will be using it for photo editing (lightroom and some basic photoshop.) We do have a couple of projects planned for 2020 that we hope will help things quite a bit for this however. Their lead over Intel was not small either, the Ryzen 9 3900X was a very impressive 22% faster than the Intel Core i9 9900K in our Lightroom Classic benchmark. While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also like to provide the individual results for you to examine. If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion. So stay tuned on that! 2) The system shouldn't lock up, but if it does, you can always do some trickery with Windows affinity so that Lightroom isn't allowed to use a handful of CPU cores. The difference shouldn't be more than 40% though. :-), - There are no information about Screenresolution- There are no information about RAM CL-Timings. I NEVER delete anything. It seems like Affinity Photo is in some Tasks much faster. The thing is, Ryzen isn’t really impressive at all in terms of performance. I recently upgraded from an Intel i5 2500K system to a AMD Ryzen 1800X-based machine. Adobe Lightroom CC 2015.8 AMD Ryzen 7 1700X & 1800X Performance Hier haste einen Vergleich. Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. Ah, got you, sorry I misunderstood! The differents can be mor den 40% !!! In theory, this could translate to almost a 20% performance increase over the previous generation, although it will likely heavily depend on the application. Are you going to do a Lightroom Classic 9.0 GPU performance test?It seems that Adobe has improved the GPU usage in Lightroom and I would like to know if I should update my graphics card or not.Great article, keep up with the great work. Most important, however, is the performance leap in editing. Its a strong alternative to lightroom and it has better performance, but I can´t seem to find how it responds to different hardwareGreat article BTW :D. Capture One is on our list, but it honestly will likely be at least a year or longer before we are able to take it on - we have a few other major project to take on first. Posted on 2020-03-16 07:14:10. In order to see how each of these configurations performs in Lightroom Classic, we will be using our PugetBench for Lightroom Classic V0.92 benchmark and Lightroom Classic version 10.0. Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow. Feel free to skip to the next sections for our analysis of these results to get a wider view of how each configuration performs in Lightroom Classic. For a number of reasons which I won't go into here, there is a preference for Quadro cards. That reference score is completely static and won't ever change until we add tests to our benchmark that forces us to re-create it. Overall, the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is currently the fastest CPU we have tested for Lightroom Classic, but the extra 5% performance over the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X for a 50% increase in cost is likely to be hard to justify for most users. As far as performance relative to older systems, that is something we've done in the past and want to do more of - we just don't have the bandwidth to do that in addition to keeping up with the latest hardware and software updates. Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. With the higher-end Ryzen models, we are looking at roughly a 14% increase in performance over the Core i9 10900K with the Ryzen 7 5800X, or a 21% increase with the Ryzen 9 5900X. 3. It does seem that Lightroom Classic in particular is memory speed sensitive and could benefit from faster RAM. The second thing to note is that we are using our soon to be released Lightroom Classic Benchmark. When we can, we try to have many of the tests be similar, but we first and foremost want to measure the performance for "typical" workflows in each app separately. It probably isn't just Lightroom though, Windows updates and drivers also have an impact on performance - and sometimes not in a good way. Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. I actually had been considering the 9900 prior to the 3900x, but the link in my OP is to some benchmarks specifically related to Lightroom performance, and the 3900x has about a 25-30% gains over the Intel counterparts. Be sure to check our list of Hardware Articles to keep up to date on how all of these software packages - and more - perform with the latest CPUs. If there is a specific task that is a hindrance to your workflow, examining the raw results for that task is going to be much more applicable than the total scores. so great that you did the test with the new 9.0 version! So overall, performance is not better with HT enabled than with it disabled, which is why we didn't disable it for this testing. Might not be much if you are lucky, or it might result in numerous random bluescreens or application crashes. Turning off SMT can improve performance a bit in tasks like exporting, but in the last few versions of LrC, it also lowers performance in active tasks. Lightroom Classic CPU performance: Intel Core X-10000 vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen. Is the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X good for Lightroom Classic? Some of the active tasks are accelerated by LR through the GPU ... Perhaps the difference in CPU performance would be much clearer with a lower GPU.• Many Lightroom users still have a Core i7-4700K in use. Why?• Video Card: Is it really meaningful to use a graphics card that would normally not be installed in a Lightroom computer (RTX 2080 Ti)? Or is it a problem with your benchmark?• NEF-Export: Intel 9960x is about the same as 3900x/3950x as expected. Puget Systems Lightroom Classic Benchmark. AMD hasn't added any more cores to their new line of processors, but among other things, they are touting a 19% IPC (instructions per clock) improvement. It is definitely one of the more "finicky" of our benchmarks (none of these apps are made for benchmarking, so we have to do some "creative" things to get them to work). The "Passive Score" does a pretty good job of summarizing performance for tasks like that as well. If there is a specific task that is a hindrance to your workflow, examining the raw results for that task is going to be much more applicable than the scores that our benchmark calculated. Even if some processes are slower, exporting and building previews can be twice as fast. I found these past couple of benchmarks incredibly helpful in choosing my next CPU. System Specs ----- Asus Pro X370 Prime (Bios 0515) Ryzen 1700x @ … Example for dragging the Noise Reduction Luminance slider, Fuji X-T1 RAW image: from almost real time to 3 seconds. Is this right? Soon after launch, there should be an update that adds support for AGESA 1.1.0 which is supposed to increase the performance of each Ryzen CPU by another few percent. For the Crowd - The overall result of active and passive tasks are indicators. AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Gaming Performance. High praise & recommendation for the current generation Ryzen CPUs. I am stoked for the release of the Ryzen 5000 chips. I notice that you perform the Lightroom benchmarks with 3200Mhz CL22 memory. In my opinion that is a shame for Intel, AMD and Adobe altogether and not a reason to hype anybody. Why? The reason I ask is because there are many reports of Lightroom not performing well if the CPU has more than 4 physical cores.
https://egloff-es.ch/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/EgloffEngineeringSolutionsLogo-300x93.png 0 0 https://egloff-es.ch/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/EgloffEngineeringSolutionsLogo-300x93.png 2020-12-23 06:39:322020-12-23 06:39:32lightroom benchmark ryzen